[Anyone] 9/11, ABC Disinformation, and Four Competing Theories

[Thos Myers]

There is a lerge sifference between free speech and lying, particularly
when you are preaching your lies as truth.

I haven't seen bill's name come up in the petitions and letters that I
have signed and written.

Why would bushies and the rest want to suppress the truth?


On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Mike in Taos wrote:

> Instead of trying to suppress free speech bill clinton should make his own
> version of the movie and stop trying to censor ABC.
>
> >
> >Below are 4 theories aboput the 9-11 attacks.  These are timely as ABC is
> >airing a fiction about 9-11 starting Sunday.  The Monday segment is
> >preceeded by a message from the Great Prevaricator himself.
> >http://abc.go.com/
> >The GP will need to watch this show so he can at least have 1 fiction to
> >spout about what happened.
> >
> >  "All we are saying is give
> >peace a chance."
> >www.taosdailyweekly.com
> >Read the Weekly daily.
> >
> >
> >
> >From: Rob Williams <rob.williams at madriver.com>
> >
> >
> >Hi friends,
> >
> >
> >Since the events of five years ago, there are now at least 4 theories
> >about what may have happened on 9/11 being debated in global
> >communities, though the last two theories rarely - with the exception
> >of Air America's Randi Rhodes show and a few others - crack through the
> >censorious facade of US "news" media.
> >
> >Theory #1: The official story - 19 box-cutter wielding Muslim fanatics
> >directed by a Afghani cave-dwelling leader on a dialysis machine
> >surprised the US government, intelligence and defense communities and
> >single-handedly flew 4 planes into 3 buildings, two of which collapsed
> >(WTC) without any help, thus launching (or perpetuating) a jihadist war
> >on the West. Why do they hate us?
> >
> >(The evidence for this theory, if looked at closely, is flimsy to
> >borderline ridiculous.)
> >
> >Theory #2: The "incompetence" theory - The above 9/11 events happened,
> >and the US government and military establishment were grossly negligent
> >in their response to the tragedy, from failed protocols the day of, to
> >stonewalling a public investigation until 441 days after the actual
> >attack. Surprising that not a single person within the US government,
> >intelligence or regulatory agency communities, with the possible
> >exception of CIA director George Tenet, have ever been brought to task
> >for gross negligence.
> >
> >Theory #3: The "Let It Happen On Purpose" (LIHOP) theory - The above
> >9/11 events happened, with the knowledge of some key US government and
> >intelligence, presumably as a pretext for galvanizing support for a
> >more aggressive US foreign policy globally. (MEF's film "Hijacking
> >Catastrophe," which premiered at the 2004 ACME Summit in San Francisco,
> >come very close to suggesting this theory, and is an excellent account
> >of the newo-conservative influence now holding sway, if for a bit
> >longer, in DC.)
> >
> >Theory #4: The "Made It Happen On Purpose" (MIHOP) theory - The above
> >9/11 events happened, and were orchestrated by key US government and
> >intelligence players as what is called a "false flag" operation - in
> >which patsies (in this case, Arab deviants, black sheep, and criminals
> >on the payroll of Western intelligence players) are used to take the
> >public fall for a "shock and awe" event planned and executed by "moles"
> >and others within the US halls of power, for the purpose of galvanizing
> >same public support for the "war on terror," an aggressive foreign
> >policy. There is a long and rich history of false flag operations, by
> >the way, for anyone who may be interested in looking past traditional
> >textbook accounts of history.
> >
> >After many months of research and conversation with folks around the
> >world, and a close look at the evidence, I'm convinced that Theory #4
> >is the most plausible.
> >
> >And, while there are a lot of nutty 9/11 web sites and disinformation
> >out there, I'd recommend:
> >
> >Webster Tarpley's SYNTHETIC TERROR
> >Michael Ruppert's CROSSING THE RUBION
> >David Ray Griffin's THE NEW PEARL HARBOR and 911 COMMISSION: OMISSIONS
> >AND DISTORTIONS
> >
> >As four thoughtful, well-researched, sourced books if people want to
> >learn more.
> >
> >Incidentally, there is a Hollywood film from the 1980s called THE
> >PACKAGE (starring Gene Hackman and Tommy Lee Jones), which captures the
> >way theory #4 works better than most films I've seen.
> >
> >And "V for Vendetta," now out on DVD, is a remarkably prescient film
> >that explores many of the themes at work in our own political culture
> >right now - The "Guy Fawkes Day" plot, around whom the character of V
> >is loosely based, is widely believed by historians of false flag
> >operations to be the "classic false flag" example, and saw English
> >elites engineering a plot to blow up Parliament, "nabbing" and blaming
> >the patsy (Fawkes himself) who allegedly planned the plot, and then
> >linking said patsy to the Spanish government, thus justifying a
> >subsequent war against Spain that led to the rise of London and the
> >British Empire, as well as the slow death of Spanish hegemony globally.
> >
> >And, of course, both Hollywood and the corporate commercial TV networks
> >have been working over time to solidify THEORY #1 in our collective
> >psyche for a while now - watch IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF BIN LADEN or Paul
> >Greenglass "United 93" as two examples of what I would call
> >disinformation of the most Orwellian order.
> >
> >So - maybe some of this information may be of use as we attempt to make
> >sense of myriad 9/11 propaganda being spun right now.
> >
> >
> >Rob Williams - http://www.robwilliamsmedia.com
> >(media)music(literacy)history(education)curriculum(consulting)...
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Anyone mailing list
> >Anyone at laplaza.org
> >http://lists.laplaza.org/mailman/listinfo/anyone
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anyone mailing list
> Anyone at laplaza.org
> http://lists.laplaza.org/mailman/listinfo/anyone
>